Mission Impossible 4: The Ghost Protocol

Imagine you’re Ethan Hunt. You’re chilling out at a plush beach resort, knocking back a cold beer and eyeing the cheese. Your bikini-clad waitress brings you one of those drinks with an umbrella in it. You clearly didn’t order it but it does look interesting, and you aren’t inclined to say no to her. But then, that umbrella turns out to be a messaging device that says something on the lines of:

A megalomaniac has obtained control of a nuclear device and is likely to detonate it in x hours. The world teeters on the brink of destruction. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to stop said megalomaniac and save the world. If you are stupid or unlucky enough to get caught while doing this, we strongly recommend suicide, ’cause we’ll disavow you and you really don’t wanna drop the soap in the showers of those foreign prisons. This message will self-destruct in five seconds.

It’s that highlighted phrase that always gets to me. Ask yourself how likely it is that you’ll say: “Nah, I’m having too good a time here. You carry on without me. I’m sure there are other  agents chomping at the bit and hoping I’ll turn this one down so that they can get a nice bullet point on their resume.”

Maybe it does happen sometimes. Maybe, like Terry Pratchett says, in some other universes this would be a very short movie. But he does choose to accept it, and it isn’t such a short movie after all, but it does manage not to outstay its welcome.

As thrill-a-minute rides go, though, this one is more entertaining than most. For one thing, the action set pieces are as spectacular as one would hope. For another, the movie plays like the other MI/Bond movies would play if all those cool gadgets worked like they really do in the universe we inhabit. The device conveying the mission brief doesn’t always self-destruct on schedule, for instance.

And yet our intrepid heroes keep plugging away and finding ways around all those little glitches, even if they’re hanging from a glass wall on the Burj Khalifa. And while they do this, they find time for the odd wisecrack or two. The actors inhabiting these roles (Tom Cruise, Paula Patton, Jeremy Renner and Simon Pegg) do a wonderful job of making it all work. The villain (Michael Nykvist, who plays Mikael Blomkvist in the Swedish film versions of the Steig Larsson novels) doesn’t have much to do, primarily because his opponents are more busy debugging than saving the world from him. But what little screen time he has, he uses effectively. Anil Kapoor is present primarily for comic relief (although I am not entirely convinced that this was intentional).

Here’s the thing, really: I watched the entire movie questioning every little thing that went wrong, asking myself how it would all get explained in the end by some grand plot twist. With that came the realization that, had it not been for the labyrinthine deceptions that characterized the first movie in the series, I would probably have just leaned back and let things go bang all around me.

Baradwaj Rangan, in his review of the movie, says:

They could design a game from these films. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to recount the plot in detail.

Personally, I liked it better when that mission was impossible.


,

10 responses to “Mission Impossible 4: The Ghost Protocol”

  1. I guess they shot the climax in India due to budget constraint… They probably just had enough to rope in Anil Kapoor…

    1. That role was better suited to Vadivelu’s special talents, and would’ve come in under the budget.

      1. Also they missed an opportunity to include an item number (a bollywood must) in that setting to ease the mounting tension…Anil would have loved to watch Paula Patton dancing 🙂

      2. Also, given all the bugs in the system, it would’ve been interesting to have a situation where the team tries to go to Dubai to intercept the code transfer, and finds itself in Cochin instead. You could call the movie MI4: The Gaja Protocol.

        Ah, so many missed opportunities…

      3. ROFL @ The Gaja Protocol. Well played.

      4. Thanks!

        I am toying with the theory that nearly any film can be improved by the presence of Vadivelu or any appropriate Tamil comedian in it. The Harry Potter series, for instance, desperately calls out for Snake Babu to be the heir of Sytherin. The Star Wars franchise could easily do with a more Vadivelu-esque Jabba the Hutt. (Given how often Lucas toys with his own creations, we might even be able to persuade him to do this).

  2. Hmmm yes. Hopefully in MI5 they will fully convert it to bollywood style… to please the ‘world’ (indian) market ” 🙂

  3. […] The film is populated with a fine cast of character actors. Stephen Fry has a scene-stealing turn as Holmes’ brother Mycroft. “You mean there are two of you?” asks Mary at one point, and you can see why she feels that way. Jared Harris exudes a quiet menace as Moriarty. His exchanges with Holmes are beautifully written and acted. Noomi Rapace plays a gypsy fortune-teller — she does as good a job as the role lets her, but you cannot escape the feeling that this is scant reward for playing Lisbeth Salander in the Swedish film series. (Not that the man playing Kalle Blomkvist fared any better.) […]

  4. […] Mission Impossible 4: The fate of the Anil Kapoor character is the epitome of vada pochche. […]

  5. […] few years ago, when I wrote a review of MI4 (not to be confused with the smartphone model — this one’s more expensive, and that one […]

Leave a reply to The Vadivelu Principle « 24 frames per second Cancel reply